Initially I wasn't going to respond to Brown Eyes' first two comments on my last post as I thought they were so ridiculously far off the mark that they didn't merit it. But there is now a third comment from this person and I will clarify a few things. I'm spending Beanie's precious morning nap time doing this instead of brushing my teeth and finishing the washing up from yesterday by the way. Harumph.
1. Brown Eyes fails to appreciate that this blog is not really a place I write about Beanie. The content of the posts here is of course skewed towards grief. That's why I started my blog. Another reason is that I believe my readers are made up to a large extent of others who have lost children, unlike Brown Eyes. Some have gone on to have other living children, others have not. I haven't yet decided that I will post about Beanie endlessly here, or the joys that he brings every day. Before he was born, with a few exceptions, it wasn't really what I felt good reading about. Maybe I will change that. Maybe I won't feel the need to write about him.
2. To answer Brenda's question - note, a question rather than a judgement - no, I don't think Beanie is suffering or will suffer. Of course he will be affected. But I don't think that is unusual - surely all children are affected by circumstances in the wider world from the moment they are born or even conceived.
Let's imagine for a moment that a child is born to someone who is somewhat over-confident in their opinions instead of wanting to listen, hear and understand. Is that person's children going to
suffer? Probably not. Will they be affected? Of course! For example, they might end up feeling like their parent has unrealistic expectations of them to have a stiff upper lip no matter what happens since that is the example set. It's just a theory. It could affect them some other way.
All children are affected by their parents or caregivers. They are sponges absorbing everything around them. I mean, duh!
I fully intend to tell Beanie about his older brothers when I feel the time is right. There are pictures of all three of my sons in my home and I'm not taking them down anytime soon. Beanie is certainly not being "punished" in any way. I don't let Beanie cry alone whilst I weep at photos of V and A in another room.
3. I don't write about A as much here. But I view A as much my son as V. It's not easy to go through ter.min.atio.n and it's not easy to write about it. I think about A a lot and wonder if our decision helped him to avoid suffering or not.
I have a post brewing about A but it's a very slow brew. Opinions on the topic are extremely polarised, especially in the US where I also have a lot of readers. So a post about it has to be written carefully to try and maximise the understanding. Right now I don't have enough time to spend on writing it carefully enough.
4.
"As a parent you are obligated to put your own emotions into a box and show your children unconditional love and appreciation." This could only be written by someone whose emotions have never been intense enough to spill out of those convenient boxes. And I don't actually even agree with the statement on its own. It makes you sound a bit like a Stepford Mom.
There are no conditions on my love for Beanie. I'm not sure where I've written otherwise. I thought the magic thing about love was that it grows to cover all that need it - it doesn't need to be divided in parts.
5. But the biggest load of crap written by Brown Eyes is the following:
"If god forbid any of my children died I would be heartbroken and want to die myself. I can not even begin to fathom life without the joy they bring me every day. But I would also know that my other children would need me to be strong...and for them...somehow I would try so hard. I would seek all the councelling in the world if it would help me to be able to be there for my other children. I would do anything. I would not simply accept that this is the best I get(which is obviously still very VERY griefstricken) and therefore the best the other living children get."So this person cannot bring herself to even imagine one of her children dying, which doesn't surprise me. Yet she is so confident that she already knosw how she would deal with it, believes that counselling is a magic wand that will eventually wave all hurts away if you just stick at long enough and all this even though she would want to die! A true superwoman with limitless powers.
After the death of a child, when the moment of you wanting to die has past, you manage to get out of bed, you slowly begin functioning again (note I said functioning not living), and then one day you might be able to laugh with friends (the ones who haven't blindsided you with silence or their refusal to acknowledge what happened as it is too much for them) and can begin to start living again. The living is unlikely to be the same as before just a shattered vase stuck together again won't be the same as before either.
Now Beanie has woken up and I have to go. I actually agree with Brown Eyes' profile
" I don't care if "its your blog, and you're entitled to your feelings", if you put them out there for the world to read...prepare to get some criticisms." Maybe that's why there is nothing in her own blog. You can't filter out quality comments from ridiculous ones on the Internet.
I turned off comments on this post as I don't think further comments discussion on this will bring anyone anything.